I have had an idea for an wiki for catalogers in Vermont for a while and this was the perfect opportunity to at least lay the groundwork. I’ve used PBWiki before, so I figured I’d try out Wikimedia. I haven’t yet figured it all out, especially how to make a new page or archive pages…it’s possible that all these layers of functionality aren’t free. Or maybe I just need to, I don’t know, actually read the documentation and learn to use it. Anyway, here’s a link to it: Vermont Cataloging Cooperative.
21 August 2008
Leave a Comment
9 March 2008
Leave a Comment
Evidently I already had a LibraryThing account. Typical of me to sign up for something and forget all about it. So, I didn’t try something new, but actually bothered to play with LibraryThing properly.
I had never made adjustments to the catalog records. I have to say, it was kind of liberating to edit records without a manual. It felt more like playing, figuring it out as I went. At the same time, though, I kept thinking of better ways to arrange information, or more information sources, and kept going back to edit all the records so there was consistency. I then realized that was futile because there is no standard by which to enter information, so everyone is just doing their thing. I’m not criticizing LibraryThing for that…if I did I’d have to point the finger at OCLC, too, and look how many standards they have! I regularly find myself choosing between 5 records for the same book. Hmmmm.
I found myself adding information free-form at first, but with every subsequent edit it started to look more and more like ISBD. I capitalized all the words in the title, didn’t use abbreviations, and used some different punctuation, but I’m not fooling anybody with those cosmetic differences. It is hard to teach and old dog new tricks, even old dogs who want to learn new tricks! It’s not that I don’t think there’s something to ISBD, it’s that I’m finding that my politics and practice don’t necessarily match up. I want to try new things and think outside the box, but the box is so solid and so familiar that I just gravitate to it, almost mindlessly.
I love the social aspect. I remember when I started my LibraryThing account, I was only the second person to add The Joy of Cataloging by Sanford Berman. I was so excited I sent the other person a message and we had a lovely exchange about radical cataloging. This is the money as far as LibraryThing is concerned.
Forgive the lack of attention to the Harry Potter books. The whole set is out on loan to a friend and I just can’t edit without the item in hand ;)
8 March 2008
Leave a Comment
Okay, I have been immersed in cataloging/metadata/FRBR discussion lists and blog posts lately. All of this discussion is making my head hurt a little, honestly. Is cataloging becoming obsolete? Should it? People seem to fall on all sides of this argument. It seems like there’s a lot of pressure on those of us who haven’t picked a side to do so, and loudly.
So, here’s what I think. I’m not going to pick a side.
The argument that cataloging should cease to exist is a very bold and also views cataloging in a very narrow way. Or maybe it’s that the very narrow way catalogers see themselves should cease to exist. Regardless of the rise and fall of social categorization, history of similar movements shows that the embracing and then rejecting of “authority” and “control” has been happening since the dawn of time. It just keeps circling. And lets not forget that it is this very pattern that allows for evolution of thoughts and ideas into action in every field. It helps to challenge what we do so that it becomes the best it can be. Isn’t that what we want?
Of course cataloging should not continue on unchanged! To do so would assume that we had found the very best way to organize information and provide access to it. Would any of us agree that we have been working within the realm of the perfect? Seriously? Anyone who frequents the AUTOCAT listserv knows that the ambiguity we’ve been working in, and the attempts to fit new materials and new methods into AACRII rules is often the worst kind of shoehorning. In a lot of ways, especially with new media, we’re just guessing as we go. Trying to achieve visual consistency is not the same as good knowledge representation (although they do go together very nicely when done well!)
So the general public thinks it can do better than librarians and information professionals at large at describing and providing access to information. Well, in some ways they probably can. The most innovative and brilliant people in our field will take what we’ve been doing right and combine it with what the most innovative and brilliant people not in our field have been doing and make something incredible. And it will be better and we can’t even conceive of it yet, even though we’re seeing the rough edges form. But even this system will not perfect, and once the glamour has worn off and we’ve worked with it for a long time, discontent will arise and the process starts again.
This is the natural way. I for one am really excited to be watching it happen, and hopefully someday soon I’ll feel bold enough to contribute something to the evolution. It’s exciting people, get psyched!