Well, what do you know, I go to the SEOmoz Web 2.0 Awards and there is my previously mentioned iGoogle, ranking third in the Start Pages category. I could have tried out one of the others, but since I’ve been talking about customizing an iGoogle page forever, it seemed like the thing to do.

My verdict is that it’s fun, but I wouldn’t say it’s absolutely necessary. Of course, if I find out that I can have all my Google apps available on one tab for my viewing, which is probably possible and I missed it, then it will be come necessary. It was fun looking at all the widgets they have for it, but overall, I don’t feel like this is adding to my life in any way. It’s just something else to look at.

Maybe it’s because I only finished grad school last year and the whole 2.0 thing was all we read/talked about for two years, but I’m just a smidge burned out on it all. Not the technology parts, but the whole “what is library 2.0?” debate. I guess I just don’t care if libraries are 2.0, or maybe I take the tact that libraries have always been 2.0. The thing is, librarians worth their salt are always out there discovering new tools and resources, even if they just stumble upon it in the course of their usual work, and trying it out on their patrons. Good librarians are always debating the relative merits of hot new resources. What seems to change is the stuff we stumble on. Instead of a new magazine or journal, it’s a new tech tool or a wiki. Or, really, it’s all of those things. I know librarians who have been recommending blogs and wikis and things to patrons since long before they knew that wikis were a big deal, or that a wiki was what the tool was called. Or even more, that librarians recommending wikis was a big deal. They found a resource and they shared it, isn’t that what we do?

The whole focus on being a 2.0 library has actually taken a lot of focus away from librarians being the 2.0 folks they already were. We’re all in this mad scramble to get on board and use all this hip new stuff and we’re bypassing the whole process that we used to use to determine whether the tool was appropriate or useful to our patron base. Remember when we used to come across something, ponder it’s value and uses, and then offer it up if we thought our patrons might benefit from it. Remember that? Isn’t that kind of what people come to libraries for? It’s not just the books or the movies or the computers. It’s access to someone who has done the research so you don’t have to. It’s access to resources that you know have been combed through. Isn’t that part of it?

And, in all this scramble, a lot of our basic services are suffering or not getting enough attention. For example, how many poorly designed library websites are out there with a blog and a Flickr stream attached? It is not really our job to be hip for the sake of being hip. That energy would have been much better spent on making sure the website was basic, standards compliant, and usable by all the patrons with the desire to use it. This basic building block is being ignored in web design in the rush to have this fancy stuff usable on the library web presence. I worry, what else are we bypassing? It was just so much easier when we folded this new information into our work rather than focusing so hard on now, NOW!!!

I think that things like the 23 Things is a great way to crash course librarians who have not, for whatever reason, had a good entry into these tools. But let’s all try to remember that we are shopping around here. Our patrons look to us to comb through all this stuff and offer them what we think they will use and maybe even just what they will like. But not every community is the same, and if you’re not in a community that cares about your library blog, than we shouldn’t feel like we have to use that piece for the library.

I don’t have a lot of personal use for Technorati right now, even though I do think it’s the bee’s knees. I am already drowning in blogs and have no want or need to discover more for the time. But, I think that this is a brilliant tool if you are looking. For instance, I told my partner that this would be a great tool for him to use to search for professional blogs and special interest blogs to keep up on things that are relevant to his field when he goes back to school. I’ll let you know if this turns out to be true!

Also, this technology works great with Del.icio.us as a way to share what you’re finding out there. I can see why they would be put in the same week as tandem discovery tools.

Technorati would be great if your preferred delivery method for news is blog based. I myself have tried a few things over the years and prefer to address news in the form of feeds from the Burlington Free Press, Times-Argus and Rutland Herald, New York Times alerts, and hitting Google News on my lunch break. But that’s me.

Not all Web 2.0 stuff is going to be a sure fit, we’re just shopping around here. I refuse to feel guilty because the latest and greatest thing that “all the cool librarians are using” doesn’t do it for me. For example, I’m just going to say it, I find both Second Life and Twitter to be absolutely useless to me. Utterly. And I will not be exploring them any further (unless I have to for this endeavor, but rest assured, I will not be delighted about it). But, I know other folks who swear by and absolutely love them. I don’t understand how people can live without their feed reader. To each their own. There’s plenty out there, and if you don’t think it’s fun or useful, then you will have a hard time convincing anyone else to use it. Or maintain it for your library, and the last thing we need to see on library web pages is dead technology that never gets updated.